ELTMAPS
Page
C ontents:
Part
I: School Systems, Curricula and Course Content
-
Leo Rogers: The School Systems and
School Mathematics in the
ELTMAPS
Partner Countries; Inservice Course Description and Choice
of Topics
Part
II: Principles and Motivations
-
Leo
Rogers: Epistemology, Methodology
and the Building of
Meaning
in a Community of Practice in England 1960 – 1980
-
Despina
A. Stylianou, Maria Meletiou-Mavrotheris: Building
Instructional
Bridges from Elementary to Secondary School: A
New Role for Technology
Part
III: From the Classroom
-
Leo
Rogers: Questions for Teachers; Questions from Children
-
Marie
Kubínová: Boxing
-
Marie
Kubínová: Origami
-
Sue
Pope: The Use of Origami in the Teaching of Geometry
-
Jarmila
Novotná, Leo Rogers: Word Problems: A Framework for Understanding,
Analysis and Teaching
-
Giancarlo
Navarra: Pop-ups
-
Leo Rogers: Some Explorations on a
Square-dot Lattice: Areas, Dissections,
Rational Numbers and More
Part
IV: Teaching Notes
-
Leo
Rogers: Dynamic Geometry Using Cabri géomčtre
-
Leo
Rogers: Rational Numbers Posters
-
Leo
Rogers: Polyshapes – Some Lessons
-
Jarmila
Novotná, Marie - Kubínová: Some
Experiences with Egyptian
Fractions
-
Sue
Pope: The 1-100 Square and Other
2-Way Tables on a
Spreadsheet
183
-
Marie
Kubínová: Boxing. Some Notes on
the Preparation of the
Lessons
Appendices
-
Appendix
1: Booklists and other Published Resources 195
-
Appendix
2: Internet Links
|
Leo ROGERS, Jarmila NOVOTNÁ (Editors), Classroom
contexts. Effective
learning and teaching of Mathematics from primary to secondary school,
2003, pp. 230,
19.00, ISBN 88-371-1396-X
Introduction:
Changes in Classroom Practice
Radical
changes in classroom practice were being developed in the 1960s and 70s by
a group of English mathematics teachers whose didactical experiments in
the classroom were discussed and critically analysed. Some of this
experimental approach was written up in two books published in 1967 and
1977 (Rogers: Epistemology, Methodology and the Building of Meaning
1960 – 1980 in this book). At the same time, similar work was being
carried out in France, Germany and Belgium and was partly influenced by
the general awareness that the school mathematics curriculum and teaching
methods had to be revised. Much of this work, while being influenced by
theoretical ideas, came from the direct experience of teachers working in
the classroom and was often based on intuition and sensitivity to
children's problems of learning mathematics. At the same time, the work of
Piaget was just becoming known to teachers, and it provoked many questions
about standard classroom practice, and the widely held assumptions about
children's’ learning. Today, we have moved on considerably. Our
understanding of teaching and learning has developed new awareness of the
fluidity and uncertainty of what constitutes the learning process, while
at the same time, we are aware of certain approaches and contexts which,
while they do not guarantee success, are more likely to produce favourable
results for both pupils and teachers. There is also much less certainty
about the nature of knowledge and of understanding. Reports of
experimental work in the classroom which are sensitive to new knowledge in
social and cognitive science is providing much more data which demands
qualitative rather than quantitative analysis, and we are more
understanding of the techniques in this field, and of the degree of
certainty (or uncertainty) of the knowledge gained. In this book we have a
variety of written means of communicating our ideas. Some as lesson plans,
some as commentaries on a sequence of lessons, some examples of pupils’
work, and some more open descriptions of possible ways of working. Our
basic working principles can be stated quite briefly:
•
mathematics is not ‘given’ a priori, nor a fixed body of
eternal truths
•
mathematics is a human creation and consequently can be fallible and
uncertain
•
mathematics arises from the need to solve problems, and new mathematics
can be created for specific purposes
•
learning mathematics is a process of the individual creating new ideas or
re-creating earlier knowledge for themselves
•
the creative activity of doing mathematics is similar in the child as in
the
adult although they have different resources and experiences
•
learners are not ‘empty vessels’ to be filled with facts; we respect
them for their independence and freedom to learn in different ways.
The
spirit of our communication is not new3; we share these beliefs and
principles with a large number of mathematics educators and teachers. They
are supported now by a considerable body of research into teaching and
learning mathematics which has been developing new philosophy and
methodology over the last 40 years. It has become clear that the surest
way to improve our teaching is to listen carefully to what our pupils say,
to reflect upon and evaluate their actions, to question our own prejudices
and to recognise that understanding is often quite difficult to achieve,
and this needs a sensitive approach by the teacher. We are not suggesting
that there is one ‘best’ approach to the problems of teaching and
learning mathematics, but we are offering our collective experience of
ways which we hope can be adapted by the reader to suit the conditions in
their own class, their school, and their educational context. We ask you
then to engage with these activities yourself, to experiment with the
situations, to think about questions to ask, to think about how you would
enable your pupils to engage in similar activities, and to think about
your own experiences and your responses to pupils
Leo
Rogers and Jarmila Novotná
|